Models, Methods and Applications of Group Multiple-criteria Decision Analysis in Complex and Uncertain Systems

نویسندگان

  • Mariya Sodenkamp
  • Martin Schneider
  • Leena Suhl
چکیده

Much of existing decision making research focuses on algorithms designed to measure the preferences of different experts on a finite set of alternatives with regard to multiple conflicting criteria and trade them off alongside objective problem-relevant data. Moreover, a number of analytical methods have been developed to handle informational gaps and uncertainty. However, practical decision structures and problem requirements are versatile and more complex than the existing single-method approaches assume. Therefore, the issue of constructing user-friendly decision support procedures able to capture complexity and produce valid solutions is a relevant and unresolved problem. This thesis addresses the challenges of developing system-oriented decision support models and methods for complex multi-criteria group decision problems involving uncertainty. In essence, this research builds upon multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) theory and system analytical concepts. First of all, the limitations and advantages of different MCDA techniques are analyzed and new integrated methodologies are developed to benefit from the strengths of individual methods while avoiding their weaknesses. Furthermore, this thesis studies the existing empirical and analytical approaches to group decision making and proposes novel methods to aggregate the opinions of different experts. In particular, the focus is on the aspects of group structuring and responsibilities definition, as well as on measuring and analyzing subjective expert estimates‟ reliability and discordance of opinions in groups. Finally, the developed methods are capable of considering informational uncertainties by using the tools of fuzzy set theory and its generalizations. Additionally, various methods from the broader science of operations research and management as well as visualization techniques are employed to precisely model the practical systems. While each paper of this cumulative thesis makes its own contribution theoretically and in a particular decision problem, from a broad viewpoint, the contribution of this work is to create more constructive relationships between decision-making-related disciplines to produce accurate, effective and efficient solutions of multi-criteria problems.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Extensions of ELECTRE-I and TOPSIS methods for group decision-making under complex Pythagorean fuzzy environment

Multi-criteria group decision-making is a process in which decision makers assess the performance of alternatives on the basis of conflicting criteria to opt the most worthy alternative as solution. TOPSIS and ELECTRE are effective and commonly used methods to solve multiple criteria decision-making problems. The aim of this study is to propose two new models, namely, complex Pythagorean fuzzy ...

متن کامل

An extended intuitionistic fuzzy modified group complex proportional assessment approach

Complex proportional assessment (COPRAS) methodology is one of the well-known multiple criteria group decision-making (MCGDM) frameworks that can focus on proportional and direct dependences of the significance and utility degree of candidates under the presence of mutually conflicting criteria in real-worldcases. This studyelaboratesa newintuitionistic fuzzy modified group complex proportional...

متن کامل

Multigranulation single valued neutrosophic covering-based rough sets and their applications to multi-criteria group decision making

In this paper, three types of (philosophical, optimistic and pessimistic) multigranulation single valued neutrosophic (SVN) covering-based rough set models are presented, and these three models are applied to the problem of multi-criteria group decision making (MCGDM).Firstly, a type of SVN covering-based rough set model is proposed.Based on this rough set model, three types of mult...

متن کامل

Evaluation of recommender systems: A multi-criteria decision making approach

The evaluation and selection of recommender systems is a difficult decision making process. This difficulty is partially due to the large diversity of published evaluation criteria in addition to lack of standardized methods of evaluation. As such, a systematic methodology is needed that explicitly considers multiple, possibly conflicting metrics and assists decision makers to evaluate and find...

متن کامل

A Multi-layer Architecture Based on MCDM Methods to Select the Best E-Readiness Assessment Model According to SWOT Analysis

E-readiness is one of the major prerequisites for effective implementation of e-government. For the correct implementation of e-government, it is needed to accurately assess the state of e-readiness in desired community. In this regard, there are models to assess, but the correct choice of model is one of the most important challenges in this area. The process of evaluating and selecting the ap...

متن کامل

Group Decision Making based on a New Evaluation Method and Hesitant Fuzzy Setting with an Application to an Energy Planning Problem

In recent two decades, countries focused on minimum extraction of fossil fuels and utilized the renewable energies based on countries' policies and the environmental considerations. Thus, choosing the best renewable energy alternative is a significant role to investment on them. Among the classical decision approaches that have used in the literature, the hesitant fuzzy sets (HFSs) theory is ap...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2013